AI Red Teaming & LLM Pen Testing
Find weaknesses before attackers do.
- Prompt-injection and jailbreak testing
- Data-leakage and exfiltration tests
- Agent tool-abuse scenarios
- Detailed findings and fixes
We help you test, secure and govern AI systems from red-teaming LLM applications and adding guardrails to building AI policies, risk registers and compliance evidence for regulators, auditors and customers.
Generative AI and agents introduce new risks: prompt injection, data leakage, hallucinated advice, biased decisions and agents taking unintended actions. At the same time, regulations and customer expectations around AI are tightening.
AI Technocrats provides AI governance services that combine security engineering with practical policy work. We test your AI systems the way attackers and real users would, fix what we find with guardrails and architecture changes, and set up the governance processes that keep AI safe as it evolves.
Because we build AI systems ourselves, our recommendations are concrete specific controls, code-level fixes and monitoring not just checklists.
Protect your users, data and reputation as you scale AI.
Find weaknesses before attackers do.
Add runtime protection to AI apps.
Measure quality and safety continuously.
Set clear rules for AI use.
Prepare for audits and regulation.
Design AI systems that are safe by default.
AI governance is the set of policies, processes and technical controls that ensure AI systems are safe, fair, secure and compliant throughout their lifecycle. It covers which AI is allowed, how it is tested, who approves it, how it is monitored and how incidents are handled.
Large language models need new security practices. A model can be tricked by instructions hidden in a web page or document (prompt injection), reveal confidential data from its context, or when connected to tools take actions nobody intended. Traditional application security testing does not catch these issues on its own.
Our AI governance services join the two worlds: technical testing and guardrails for each AI system, and an organisation-wide framework that maps to standards such as ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and to regulations including the EU AI Act and India's DPDP Act.
A side-by-side view of what changes.
| Concern | Traditional application security | LLM and agent security |
|---|---|---|
| Main attack surface | Code, APIs and infrastructure | Prompts, retrieved content and tools |
| Typical threats | Injection, auth flaws, misconfiguration | Prompt injection, data leakage, tool abuse |
| Testing method | Pen testing and code scanning | Adversarial red teaming and evaluations |
| Behaviour | Deterministic | Probabilistic, needs continuous evaluation |
| Controls | WAF, access control, patching | Guardrails, output validation, least-privilege tools |
What a mature governance programme gives you.
Vulnerabilities are found and fixed before launch.
Clear processes let teams ship AI with confidence.
Documentation and evidence ready for audits.
Demonstrable controls win enterprise deals.
Sensitive information stays where it belongs.
Continuous evaluation keeps AI accurate over time.
Custom AI solutions designed to empower your business growth.
A continuous loop that keeps every AI system safe after go-live.
Catalogue AI systems, models, data and owners.
Classify risk and review architecture and data flows.
Red-team and evaluate for security, safety and accuracy.
Implement guardrails, controls and fixes.
Track behaviour, incidents and compliance evidence.
Controls tailored to sector-specific risk and regulation.
scoping
Scoping
✔ done
We agree which AI systems, regulations and risks are in scope.
discovery --inventory
Discovery & Inventory
✔ done
We map AI use, data flows, vendors and owners.
test --assess
Testing & Assessment
✔ done
We red-team systems and assess controls against frameworks.
remediate
Remediation
✔ done
We implement guardrails and fix architecture and policy gaps.
rollout --train
Framework & Training
✔ done
We roll out policies, processes and team training.
assure --continuous
Continuous Assurance
✔ done
We provide monitoring, periodic re-testing and reporting.
The shifts shaping how organisations invest in this area.
Obligations under laws such as the EU AI Act are phasing in, raising documentation expectations.
AI agents with tool access create new risks that need least-privilege design and monitoring.
ISO/IEC 42001 is giving organisations a certifiable structure for AI governance.
Automated tests for safety and accuracy now run on every model or prompt change.
We know how AI systems fail because we build them.
We implement the controls we recommend.
Mapped to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF and regulations.
DPDP Act and EU AI Act considerations covered.
Can't find what you're looking for? Talk to our AI specialists.
AI governance services help organisations manage AI responsibly through policies, risk assessments, testing, guardrails, monitoring and documentation, so AI systems are safe, fair, secure and compliant.
AI red teaming is adversarial testing of AI systems. Testers try prompt injection, jailbreaks, data extraction and misuse of connected tools to find weaknesses, then recommend fixes.
Prompt injection is an attack where malicious instructions are hidden in user input or in content the AI reads, such as web pages or documents, to make the model ignore its rules or leak data. It is one of the top risks for LLM applications.
It can. Companies outside the EU may be affected if they place AI systems on the EU market or their AI outputs are used in the EU. We help assess applicability and risk classification; for legal advice, consult qualified counsel.
AI systems that process personal data must follow the DPDP Act's requirements on consent, purpose limitation and data protection. We review data flows in AI systems and recommend controls; this is not legal advice.
Yes. We assess the existing application, then add input and output filtering, PII redaction, permission checks and monitoring with minimal changes to your code.
Before launch, after significant changes such as new models, tools or data sources, and periodically in production. Continuous automated evaluation complements periodic manual testing.
ISO/IEC 42001 is an international standard for AI management systems. It sets requirements for governing AI responsibly across policies, risk management, lifecycle controls and continual improvement.
Tell us about your goals for AI Governance & Security. An AI Technocrats specialist will respond within one business day with ideas, timelines and a transparent estimate.
Our AI solutions power the digital transformation of these visionary organizations.